In South Korea, it is without doubt
that students and their families will do whatever it takes to improve their
education. Sacrifices are made in order to ensure that these students are
provided the best possible education anyone can possibly have. To some parents
in Australia, this may be understandable, but not to the extremes that the
South Korean people face in relations to education. What extremes you may ask?
Well, according to an article written on 22nd October this year and
published on ABC News by Michael Janda, he states that students in South Korea spend
an average of 14 hours of studying per day. Yes, you read that correctly – each
day. This tremendous amount of time dedicated solely to studying is
frightening to many, and it’s gradually taking its toll on the students. Korea
has one of the highest suicide rates in the world, with numbers mainly
involving young people when major exam results are released (Janda, 2013).
So, why is this happening? The main
culprit: ‘Education Fever’
The ‘Education Fever’ is “a
cultural obsession with education and educational credentials as a primary
means of societal success and recognition” (Woolley, 2013). This ‘fever’ is
deeply embedded into the nation’s culture based on traditional cultures such as
Joseon Confucianism (the institution of the civil service examination) and the
modern Korean family structure. However, it is due to the recent influence of
neo-liberalism that the Korean society has experienced a transformation,
leading them to the expansion of the private education market sector (Yang,
2011:81).
Through Confucianism, it enhances the
importance of family structure – the child must uphold the parent’s wishes, and
be respectable to their parents by obtaining a successful education. Likewise,
Confucianism also reinforces the necessity in status structure within Korea, as
it is a definite hierarchical society where education is deemed to be the key
to success (Sorensen, 1994:35). And so, it is through the application of the
Confucian culture within Korean education that forces the common Korean student
to achieve high results for the sack of their future.
However, through the manifestation
of the ‘education fever’ in modern Korea, it has become gradually evident that
such methods are placing financial burdens among numerous families, as well as
altering relationships between both parent and child. Therefore, education inequality
has increased between children who attend public and private schools. In 2011’s
OECD research paper on “Social Justice in the OECD”, it displays that success in
Korean education was through Korean parents’ willingness to pay for education
yet, access to education has not been evenly distributed among the Korean
society (pg. 22). In 2011, South Korea only ranked 19th out of the
31 countries, scoring below the OECD average (OECD, 2011:23). Eventually, if
the government does not actively assist in this increasing inequality between
public and private education, the gap in access to education will gradually
increase significantly.
Hence, due to the deeply embedded
culture found within Korean society, it has affected Korea’s current education
system, causing spaced extremes on the spectrum. Not only is there a huge
difference in the quality of education between students, it has also affected
them physically and mentally, causing many to turn to suicidal actions. Without
proper funding and assistance from the government, this inequality within
education will continue to manifest, whilst also killing the innocent youths of
the country.
References:
- Janda, Michael (22nd October 2013), “Korea’s rigorous education system has delivered growth, but it is literally killing the country’s youth”, accessed 22nd October: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-22/a-korean-education/5037704
- Yang, Young-Kyun (2011). Education and Family in Korean Society. The Review of Korean Studies, 14(1), 57-87
- http://www.hamilton.edu/news/story/kim-examines-korean-fever-for-education
- Sorensen, Clark (1994). Success and Education in South Korea. Comparative education Review, 38(1), 10-35
- Tischler, Daniel (2011). Social Justice in the OECD – How Do the Member States Compare?
No comments:
Post a Comment