‘NAPLAN’ or ‘the
National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy’ is a unified ongoing
annually test for Australian students on their literacy and numeracy level. The
result of all schools is published in a website called MySchool which allows
visitors to view and compare the result of students in different schools. The
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) states that
the NAPLAN tests “broadly reflect aspects of literacy and numeracy common to
curricula in all States and Territories”. It aims to give an objective and fair
result of educational outcome of all primary and secondary schools in
Australia.
However, only five
years after the NAPLAN test first announced, an article from the Daily
Telegraph reporter Bruce McDougall reports that the Coalition of Australia will
consider banning the publication of NAPLAN results if it wins Government on September
7 (which they already did now). The reason is that there is a series of
problems about the NAPLAN result. One of these is that the NAPALN only focus on
two major aspects of the whole education system which is not enough to
accurately reflect the education qualities of every school and moreover, the
data sets which have been published in MySchool website can be misleading when
it comes to parents choosing schools for their children as a comparison tool
ranks the school purely based on NAPLAN result.
In my opinion, the
just like the concerns mentioned above, there is a lack of social justice in
the NAPLAN result. NAPLAN only offers a very limited statistic data in limited
areas of study. However, its importance has been overly emphasised to represent
the overall education quality of every single school within Australia.
According to Gewirtz (2012), one of the two dimensions of social justice is
distributional justice (p.470), which is defined by Rawls (1972) as ‘a proper
balance between competing claims’ (p.7). In a highly theoretical education
system, all schools should have equally distributed facilities and teaching
staffs, as well as student resources. There should not be ‘bad school’ and
‘good school’. Although it not possible to do, we should still trying our best
to approach. However, the data in NAPLAN has an unbalanced view. This can
influence parents’ decisions on which schools they send their children and thus
cause more problems with imbalanced distribution of student resource, especially
in public schools.
It is not absolutely
necessary to banned NAPLAN test completely, but it is worth rethinking how
should we deliver better social justice in our education system.
References:
McDougall, B. (2013) Coalition
will consider banning publication of Naplan scores. Daily Telegraphy. Retrieved
on 9/9/2013 from: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/special-features/coalition-will-consider-banning-publication-of-naplan-scores/story-fnho52jp-1226708623403
Gewirtz, S. (1998)
Conceptualizing social justice in education:mapping the territory, Journal of
Education Policy 13(4), 469-484
RAWLS, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Clarendon
Press
No comments:
Post a Comment