The NSW laws have
been gradually progressing in regards to sexuality and transgender status, responding
to the overall tendency of higher acceptance and understanding about people who
are gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) around the world.
A news article written
by Josephine Tovey (2013) discussed the disparity in legislations in regards to
discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity of pupils. According
to the article, in NSW, The current anti-discrimination laws protect LGBT
students from discrimination against their sexuality or transgender status by declaring
it unlawful for schools to expel, refuse admission or expulsion students on
those grounds. However, NSW private schools and colleges are not subject to the
same laws that apply to public schools. Private schools are allowed to have the
freedom to take actions that are unlawful for public schools against such students.
This issue has drawn the attention of Alex Greenwich, the Independent MP for
Sydney. The success of Mr. Greenwich’s action is expected to overturn the
situation, benefiting GLBT students in not only Sydney but also the whole state.
The inequality gap
between “normal students” and those who are categorised as “abnormal” is
putting these students at the risk of becoming the victims of legitimised discrimination.
It is suggested by van Wormer and McKinney (2003) that youths who are
identified or even perceived as gay or lesbian are likely to suffer from verbal
and physical assaults (p.411). Moreover, in a school environment that the GLBT
students are not protected against discrimination by laws, such harassments and
bullying are more likely to take place.
An earlier article
by Tovey (2013) states that private schools, religious schools in particular,
have been supporting this disparity by advocating their religious freedom as a fundamental
human right. Religious schools emphasise that the dissonance between their
religious beliefs and homosexuality and transgender status attacks their on
their rights, and furthermore violates the interest of students and parents who
regard the religious faith as a prime factor when choosing schools.
I believe that it
is mistreatment for GLBT pupils to base the intrinsic value of a student on his
or her sexual orientation or sexual identity. In my opinion, sexual orientation
and gender identity are merely part of one’s identity, just like race, and
marital status. These factors should not be taken into consideration when making
judgments. Schools should be supportive for all students as every student has a
right to feel safe, and get support and protection at school. It can be done by
creating a climate of acceptance, support, and equality. Moreover, religious
schools do not require all students to be of that religion to be eligible for
admission. Similarly, GLBT students should not be refused the right of receiving
education
References
Tovey, J. (2013, July 7).
Schools defend right to expel gay students. The
Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/schools-defend-right-to-expel-gays-20130706-2pirh.html
Tovey, J. (2013, August 28).
Push to end expulsion of gay students. The
Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from
http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/push-to-end-expulsion-of-gay-students-20130827-2soet.html
van Wormer, K., & McKinney,
R. (2003). What schools can do to help gay/lesbian/bisexual youth: A harm
reduction approach. Adolescemce, 38(151),
409-420.

No comments:
Post a Comment